Skip to main content
Submitted by ester.garcia@w… on

Far exceeding anyone’s expectations, global insurance M&A last year soared to $143.5b in worldwide transactions. That total tripled 2014 while outstripping even the previous high set in 2010. This growth reflects the continual ability of firms to access their cash on hand, along with the low cost of capital available throughout the globe. 

According to a recent survey, Defying gravity by Mergermarket and Willis Towers Watson, insurers anticipate deal flow to be led by North America, with emerging Asia close at hand, 34% of M&A activity and 32% of M&A activity respectfully, and Latin American deal activity coming in at 15% of the total for 2016. 

Further, while firms already in North America are anticipating inter-regional deals to diversity and underwrite risks, firms outside the region are targeting the customer base, licenses, and technology of this mature market. 

Meanwhile, Asia’s attractive assets and innovation are luring buyers. It is also anticipated that M&A activity in Asia, over the next three years, will lead deal volume. Spurred on by China’s government, Chinese firms are seeking international business standards and international business exposure. 

Asian governments are not alone in their drive for deals, Europe, is also expecting further activity once Solvency II is formally in place. 

All this bodes well for 2016, with deal activity being further driven by several key factors:

BIG DEALS

Large transactions have returned as a trend across sectors worldwide, not just within insurance. However, within insurance, in the last year, there were four megadeals—each valued at over $5.5b—compared to just one in 2014 that was valued at $6.44b. Included in last year’s four mega deals were U.S. Aetna’s $37b acquisition of Humana and Swiss giant Ace’s $28b purchase of P&C insurer Chubb. 

Those insurance deals represent just a few of the 117 mega deals across all global sectors in 2015, as a result of low-interest rates and a plentiful supply of cheap financing. 

The trend of mega deals in insurance, like other sectors, will last as long as large targets and inexpensive financing are in abundant supply. There are a number of very large, mature reinsurance firms that are seeking to refine their panel of reinsurers to just the top five or top ten which should help drive industry consolidation. 

Top-Line Growth 

Driving deal value and deal volume is the need for companies to expand and accelerate their top-line growth. The drive for top-line growth is taking place in a challenging environment where firms are finding that achieving organic growth is difficult, especially as the marketplace becomes more competitive and crowded, leaving companies with few other options than to engage in acquisitions.  

P&C firms, in particular, say they are looking for deals that will diversify and expand their product offerings. 

For all insurers looking to capture top-line growth, existing market position and existing customer base were the key drivers in 2015, and the same is expected for 2016. Across the board, a unique customer base or unique product lines with enhanced distribution channels make for ripe geographic plays, whether the deal is inbound or outbound. As a result, these new sources of revenue are key drivers in M&A activity. 

Consolidation 

Even when looking beyond one’s borders, consolidation is happening around the globe. When an Australian company looks to acquire an Asian counterpart, or a Western European firm acquires a Central or Eastern European firm, it is clear that the growing commercial links are one of the driving sources of insurance M&A. 

Still, most insurers want to consolidate their existing market position, rather than branch out across the globe. Of the insurers surveyed, four out of five said they are planning strategic buys to focus on consolidating their core markets.  Of those asked, approximately two-thirds said they are already market leaders in the markets they are targeting. 

One exception to this is that some players are looking to move into new developing markets, as populations boom and a growing number of middle-class customers have the ability to purchase both general and life insurance products. 

Distribution 

For global insurers, the myriad of ways that distribution models continue to evolve within disparate markets is having a significant impact on M&A investment theses. Today, companies seek to find the most impactful path to reach their customers. 

In the Americas and in the APAC region, companies which view distribution as important were more likely to rate direct sales channels as highly important. In the Middle East and in Western Europe, digital distribution was a driver of deals by 56% and 45% respectively. 

Inbound Asian Investors 

Demand by foreign investors into the U.S. market continues today, as many Asian insurers view U.S. assets as valuable add-ons to their portfolios, purchasing business-building platforms that will enable growth going forward. 

Just last year, the value of deals with an Asian target was four times higher than in 2014, coming in at $21.2b, while the value of deals from Asian acquirers was close to five times as high, coming in at $48.1b. 

At a worldwide level, Asian competitors—and new non-insurance players in deals from Asia—are key in deals taking place in the developed markets of North America and Western Europe. 

Technology 

Asia Pacific companies view web technologies as vital while web and mobile deals were also especially important to EMEA insurers. In the Americas, particularly for P&C players, big data and analytics were the important tech plays. Though less of a focus, cybersecurity was a consistent concern across all regions. 

For Asian acquirers that are looking to buy in Europe, not for high growth but for technical comparative advantage, there are IT structures, distribution tools, algorithms and so on that are very attractive. 

Meanwhile, telematics technologies are beginning to rise in European marketplaces and were a driver in greater than one in ten deals in the P&C sector (11%).  An example was Japanese Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance’s purchase of Gibraltar-based telematics provider Box Innovation Group for $152.9m. That deal was based on the growing demand for connected car solutions.

Conclusion 

The following factors should be considered in any M&A deal in 2016: 

Distribution: To reach their customer base, distribution innovation is key. Insurers who compete worldwide will need an array of distribution models to maintain a competitive edge in different markets, and the evolution of these models will impact M&A activity.

Planning: Completing a deal takes careful planning. According to most analysts, the sector is oversold. While valuations are still attractive, prices are stiffer as capital comes in and insurance stocks gain. It is in this context that dealmakers in the sector need to think carefully about the metrics they are using to determine the best price for an asset.

Revenue growth may be the focus in emerging markets, but enterprise value can be a significant factor in developed markets. 

Completion: The most challenging work on a deal can be the completion. Many insurers highlight the importance of strategic rationale and not just price. Another factor is building relationships prior to any deal so that vetting and a clear path to due diligence is established ahead of time.

Honest and transparent negotiations are paramount to completing any deal. 

Competition: The competition will only stiffen in the M&A market as PE players and others enter into more developed markets. 

Value: Insurers will want to see more from their M&A deals. This means that even if the value is not always the prime reason for the price, there is the trade-off between return on investment and risk. Within the sector, life and P&C insurers continue to expect high returns on capital from emerging markets, but for mature, developed markets the reality is that there are lower potential returns. 

Strategy: Companies that tie their business and M&A strategy together, while understanding and managing these deal drivers, will more likely reap the benefits of a successful deal. 

Process: A cross-disciplined M&A team should establish deal objectives that will apply throughout the integration process. Understanding that a deal causes disruption to the business is important. Therefore, leadership expectations beyond deal-close and throughout the integration process need to be clearly articulated.  

Any acquisition will require significant changes within both the target and the buyer’s organizations, which includes key roles, business structures, and an understanding of the underlying culture of each company. 

Finally, it is of great help if a culture of learning from experience with prior deals is established.

Learn More

Learn more about how CT can provide mergers and acquisitions support for every stage of the deal, from due diligence to closing to on-going compliance. Contact us at (844) 701-2064 (Toll-free U.S.) or visit www.ctcorporation.com.

Join the conversation. Follow us on TwitterLinkedInGoogle+ and Facebook.

Authoer Name
Ian Bone, Senior Manager, Product Planning & Innovation
Business Stage
Business Type
Main Navigation Tags
Premium Content
Off
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Segment
Sole Proprietor
Single Establishment
Traditional Local Player
Tax Optimizer
Regional Operator - 1
Regional Operator - 2
Complex Operators
Resource Optimizer
Dealmaker
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
International Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography International
International
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (see Timor-Leste)
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea, South
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territories
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Geography National
Domestic
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
District of Columbia
Puerto Rico
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type