Minnesota — In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, A15-0858, decided 8/16/17. The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the appropriate test in Minnesota for distinguishing between direct and derivative claims focuses on who suffered the injury and who is entitled to recovery. Thus, the Court of Appeals should not have applied the three part test used by Delaware courts.
Premium Content
Off
Request a custom qutoe form Title
Questions? We can help.
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography National
Minnesota
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Construction
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Restaurant
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type
Contains Vidyard Video
Off