Skip to main content
Submitted by ester.garcia@w… on

Activity in the M&A market has been on an upward trend the past two years, evidenced in particular by a growing volume of mega-mergers. As always when the market heats up, competition for the best deals compresses the time available to perform adequate due diligence.

While dealmakers are often confident their transactions will prove a winner, many would acknowledge the lingering unease that often settles in as the deal nears its close. Our recent survey of many of the nation’s top dealmakers affirms these conclusions.  

We commissioned SourceMedia Research/Mergers & Acquisitions to ask 255 senior dealmakers the issues typically mitigated by due diligence that nonetheless make them uneasy when closing the deal. “Financial and accounting errors” unsurprisingly took the top spot given the bottom line impact of an erroneous number or hastily placed decimal point. More than one-quarter (27.8 percent) of the respondents selected this choice as their number one concern. 

What was rather surprising was that nearly as many dealmakers (21.6 percent) in the survey selected “unknown legal issues” as their primary concern. Despite thorough due diligence, there nonetheless remained enduring concerns over the possibility of a legacy liability or a legal obligation that somehow escaped scrutiny in the rush to close the deal.

Certainly, this apprehension among so many dealmakers would appear to argue for more than adequate legal due diligence both before and after the deal closes. The latter is especially important for complex compliance and operational reasons. There are numerous, critical post-merger steps that companies must address to ensure full legal compliance at the local, state, national, and global levels. Mistakes can result in fines, penalties, a loss of status and even business closure. Complicating this picture is that the law firms engaged in the initial due diligence typically have moved on to the next deal, leaving the acquirer to handle these issues directly.

The survey underscores other concerns that affect the post-transaction environment. For instance, more than 16 percent of respondents cited “operational problems” as their primary source of uneasiness when closing the transaction. Few people would disagree that post-merger integration is a determining factor in the ultimate success or failure of an M&A transaction. Similarly, the 8.6 percent of respondents naming “regulatory hurdles” as their top concern is strong evidence underlying the challenges in complying with current and evolving regulations.

In all cases, to reduce the element of surprise, it is recommended that dealmakers engage a provider for thorough and timely due diligence services. Equally important is to secure a provider that can offer consistent services, working directly with the law firms during the deal process and assisting the acquirer with its post-close needs. As the dealmakers in the survey are well aware, the difference between a good investment and a bad one can be a single piece of critical but overlooked information.

Learn More

CT provides comprehensive, end-to-end due diligence services that begin in the earliest stages of an M&A transaction and continue on to ensure post-integration success and assured compliance.

Learn more about how CT can provide support for every stage of the deal, from due diligence to closing to ongoing compliance.

Contact us at (844) 701-2064 (Toll-free U.S.) or visit www.ctcorporation.com. 

 

Authoer Name
Ian Bone, Senior Manager, Product Planning & Innovation
Business Stage
Business Type
Main Navigation Tags
Premium Content
Off
Show in Latest from CT on Home page
Off
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Segment
Sole Proprietor
Single Establishment
Traditional Local Player
Tax Optimizer
Regional Operator - 1
Regional Operator - 2
Complex Operators
Resource Optimizer
Dealmaker
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography National
Domestic
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
District of Columbia
Puerto Rico
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital

Content Tagging

Content Type
Contains Vidyard Video
Off