Skip to main content
Submitted by zoe.fournier@w… on

Although corporate demand for high-quality legal services continues to rise, law firms face a number of market-driven forces that are challenging their growth. It’s not just factors like increased competition or even threats of cyber-attacks and data breaches. Instead, there’s been a shift in the legal paradigm. To save money and improve efficiency, more and more corporate clients are opting to hire internally and/or send work to alternative service providers

But there is a way for law firms to stay ahead of this trend and better serve their clients at the same time. The answer is outsourcing.

How We Got to This Point

What caused this disruption in the traditional law firm model? According to legal market analyst Jordan Furlong, the combination of economic instability and advancements in technology has created a new landscape for the delivery of legal services. To put it simply, it’s now a buyer’s market for corporate clients.

Businesses want to save money. To do this, they’re seeking more efficient, higher value solutions for their legal needs. Some are turning more often to alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) for many routine legal services that used to be performed by law firms, according to Altman Weil’s Chief Legal Officer Survey.

Others are growing their internal legal teams and keeping more work in-house. This trend can be seen in the rapid growth of the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC). According to abovethelaw.com, the CLOC’s vision is to provide a “seamless legal ecosystem that delivers corporate legal support to small, medium and large businesses with peak efficiency.”

Corporate clients are also exercising their buying power to ensure that the law firms they do hire act as efficiently as possible on their behalf, including embracing more effective client-facing technology. In this new legal landscape, law firms are expected to deliver their services in the manner, and at the price point, the client expects.

Ability to Focus on Differentiation

To meet these demands for efficiency and value, many firms, even those hired for high-end work, are now providing a significant proportion of their work on an alternative fee basis, whether it’s fixed fee, capped fee or otherwise, according to Citibank.

They’re also entering into their own partnerships with alternative services providers. These partnerships allow law firms to lower their cost structures even further and serve their clients even more efficiently.

There are multiple advantages for law firms to outsource work to ALSPs. For one, law firms can get instant access to expertise not available within the firm in specific legal processes including regulatory compliance and the intricacies of mergers and acquisitions.

Furthermore, outsourcing is a cost-effective solution for carrying out repetitive work that requires a high level of accuracy and for relieving overflow during high-volume seasons. It also reduces risk. With transactions and expansions, it’s difficult to ensure you have accounted for all of the requirements and executed each step properly. One missed step can risk the legality of an entire company. Risk also surfaces when a non-compliant entity is part of another transaction.

Most importantly, the use of ALSPs frees law firms up to 1) focus on their core specialty and their most important work, and 2) be more responsive to client needs.

Looking Ahead

Success in this new legal market will likely come to firms who are most nimble in their response to client demands for a more efficient delivery of legal services, competitive pricing and the highest quality of service.

More and more law firms are agreeing that outsourcing to ALSPs is the answer. According to a 2017 study, approximately 55% of law firms agreed that ALSPs can help mitigate pricing pressures that they are feeling from their clients. Among those same firms, 41% agreed that ALSPs can help firms scale and expand their business based on changing client needs.

Learn More
To learn more about how CT can help, contact a CT representative at (844) 259-3138 (toll-free U.S.). 

 

 

Business Type
Main Navigation Tags
Premium Content
Off
Request a custom qutoe form Title
Questions? We can help.
Show in Latest from CT on Home page
Off
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Size
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography International
International
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (see Timor-Leste)
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea, South
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territories
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Geography National
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Domestic
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Construction
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Restaurant
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type
Contains Vidyard Video
Off