Peach Reo, LLC v. Rice, No. 2:12-cv-02752, decided 7/11/17. The U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee granted a motion for a charging order against the interests of the debtor member in six LLCs. The court rejected the member’s argument that a charging order was inappropriate because the operating agreements required consent before a member could assign its interests. The governing LLC statutes provide that a charging order is a lien – which is an interest in the property of another - and not an assignment of the interest.
Premium Content
Off
Request a custom qutoe form Title
Questions? We can help.
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography National
Tennessee
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Construction
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Restaurant
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type
Contains Vidyard Video
Off