Skip to main content
Submitted by ester.garcia@w… on

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed a rule that requires investment advisers to establish new anti-money laundering (AML) programs. The suggested regulation calls for advisers to implement AML policies and procedures, keep more detailed records, and file reports on specific financial transactions.

FinCEN had attempted to establish AML programs several times since the enactment of the USA PATRIOT Act. In 2002 and 2003, FinCEN proposed rules to regulate some investment advisers and unregistered investment companies. The proposals were withdrawn in 2008 because the groups’ assets were carried at institutions that were already subject to other FinCEN rules.

But the regulatory environment has changed since the 2010 passage of the Dodd-Frank Act. Now FinCEN is concerned money launderers may seek out investment advisers as a way to break into the U.S. financial system.

To prevent this from happening, FinCEN recommends three key regulatory changes:

1) Defining Investment Advisers As Financial Institutions

Under the proposed rule, investment advisers currently registered with (or who are required to register with) the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would be considered "financial institutions" subject to some of FinCEN's existing AML requirements.

The rule would mostly affect financial planners, pension consultants and other investment advisers with $100 million or more under their management. FinCEN reserves the right to include others, such as state-regulated investment advisers, in the rule.

Those who already qualify as financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, would not be required to establish a separate AML program as long as they have a comprehensive one in place that covers all of the entity’s advisory.

2) Requiring Investment Advisers To Establish AML Programs

If the rule is approved, investment advisers will have to implement a program that protects them from being used as a tool in a money laundering or terrorist scheme. The program must be risk-based, and advisers can build it into their current SEC compliance programs.

The AML program must include the following:

  • The development of internal policies, procedures, and controls
  • Appointing a compliance officer
  • Creating an ongoing employee training program
  • Establishing an independent audit function to test the program

3) Suspicious Activity Reporting

Investment advisers will be required to implement monitoring programs to catch suspicious activities, including unusual withdrawals, under the proposed rule. This may pose a challenge for hedge funds and others with active trading strategies.

The proposed rule also establishes new recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Investment advisers must create and retain fund transmittal records and ensure that specific information moves with the money to the destination financial institution.

Previously, investment advisers had to file Form 8300s for certain transactions. The proposed rule requires advisers to file currency transaction reports instead for transfers of more than $10,000 during one business day.

What This Means for Advisers

The need to be diligent is rising in importance every day. With shrinking timelines and increasingly busy staffs, it’s helpful to outsource tasks to trusted and experienced partners. This would alleviate some of the burden of the proposed rule, and lower the costs to the end client.

Learn More

Learn more about CT’s AML/KYC offerings and other Due Diligence services, contact us at (844) 701-2064.

Join the conversation. Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+ and Facebook.

Business Stage
Business Type
Main Navigation Tags
Premium Content
Off
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Segment
Sole Proprietor
Single Establishment
Traditional Local Player
Tax Optimizer
Regional Operator - 1
Regional Operator - 2
Complex Operators
Resource Optimizer
Dealmaker
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography National
Domestic
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
District of Columbia
Puerto Rico
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type