Skip to main content
Submitted by ester.garcia@w… on

A new type of transaction that's becoming increasingly popular in the secondary private equity market is drawing scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

These "stapled transactions" involve a private equity firm's general partner initiating a sale of portfolio companies from an older fund into a newer fund. The practice has recently become more widely employed. It's estimated that stapled transactions now comprise around 10 percent of the secondary private equity market.

There's a reason for this expanding popularity—stapled transactions offer a significant benefit. They allow general partners to seed new funds with existing assets or limited partner capital. Many times these deals require approval solely from the existing fund's advisory committee—a situation that may leave limited partners out of the loop before a deal closes.

Not everyone is convinced stapled transactions are entirely without cause for concern. Some observers have raised the possibility that stapled transactions may create a conflict of interest with regard to the fiduciary duties of private equity managers, as these managers are obligated to put the interests of investors over their own.

Stapled transactions may be especially tempting when general partners are having difficulties in putting together a new fund, as they allow existing assets to simply be rolled over into the new venture. In this way the general partner provides liquidity for investors while also providing investors for the new fund.

The potential for conflicts of interest to arise during a stapled transaction has drawn the attention of regulators. The SEC is on record saying such transactions are an area of concern and will be a focus of future compliance activity.

The popularity of stapled transactions has risen in recent years as fund managers seek a useful method of restructuring funds, or preventing them from becoming terminally unprofitable. These transactions provide managers with an exit for funds that are nearing their natural lifespan, while simultaneously offering capital for new funds.

Despite new scrutiny from regulators, the utility of stapled transactions means they will likely continue to grow in popularity—particularly if the U.S. economy encounters turbulence. During an economic downturn it's typically more difficult for general partners to raise new funds and to find an exit for existing portfolio companies.

Industry insiders and government regulators believe greater transparency is critical when dealing with stapled transactions. Officials with the SEC have said the disclosure of relevant information will be a key focus of compliance efforts. By providing limited partners with up front information about each transaction, conflicts of interest between general partners, limited partners and buyers can be avoided, or at least minimized.

LEARN MORE

Learn more about CT’s services supporting Private Equity professionals or contact a representative at (844) 701-2064 (toll-free USA).

Join the conversation. Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+ and Facebook.

Business Stage
Business Type
Premium Content
Off
Product Tagging
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Segment
Sole Proprietor
Single Establishment
Traditional Local Player
Tax Optimizer
Regional Operator - 1
Regional Operator - 2
Complex Operators
Resource Optimizer
Dealmaker
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography National
Domestic
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
District of Columbia
Puerto Rico
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital

Content Tagging

Content Type