Skip to main content
Submitted by ester.garcia@w… on

2014 EIGHT MOST COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTIONS FOR DOING BUSINESS

Written in conjunction with TMF Group, based on The Global Benchmark Complexity Index: International Entity Management

Planning to do business overseas? Be forewarned. If your global expansion plans take you to these eight jurisdictions, anticipate spending more time and administrative resources to keep up with corporate subsidiary compliance.

The Global Benchmark Complexity Index

International expansion expert TMF Group ranked 81 of the top international jurisdictions in order of complexity for complying with local business laws and regulations. Their resulting Global Benchmark Complexity Index identifies key factors that affect compliance, and why these jurisdictions ranked in the top eight most complex international jurisdictions.

The top three spots all go to jurisdictions in the Americas. The high ranking of these jurisdictions is not unexpected considering the isolated development of their legal systems and arguably the limited investment by the respective governments to modernize.

Argentina was clearly out in first place, with Bolivia and Peru in close contention for the second spot. The complexity of a particular jurisdiction depends upon a number of factors, although the adoption of a civil law-based legal system is a mutual characteristic of both jurisdictions.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) ranks high at number four, for different factors, many of which originate from the influence of religion. The federal judicial system in the UAE is based upon Sharia law, and although the emirates have a modern persona primarily driven by the cosmopolitan metropolis of Dubai, the administrative nature of corporate compliance is exceptionally challenging, requiring
local knowledge and an acute awareness of local custom.

The two highest-ranking Asia Pacific jurisdictions occupy positions five and six. Both Indonesia and Thailand have experienced significant economic and political turbulence during modern times and this may explain some of their complexity.

The attempted coups of 1965 in Indonesia led to the establishment of the military's New Order Administration which was supported by the US Government and encouraged foreign direct investment. However, political and economic instability, social unrest, corruption and terrorism have slowed reform, resulting in a bureaucratic system of administration.

Even though Thailand recently relaxed a number of its foreign ownership laws pertaining to the ownership of share capital, the jurisdiction has fallen behind its regional competitors in terms of reducing bureaucracy on the one hand and encouraging business development on the other. These factors, in conjunction with economic and political instability, have created a challenging environment for corporate compliance.

Poland ranks at number seven and owes much of its ranking to the systems and laws inherited from the Soviet Union. Since the revolutions of 1989 and the subsequent re-establishment of democratic rule, the jurisdiction has undertaken significant reform. However, from a corporate secretarial perspective, much of the complexity still remains.

China is also rapidly changing and in so doing is taking its place on the world stage. Its multi-provincial legal landscape is one aspect contributing to the challenging environment for multinational companies. Local knowledge and expertise is essential, as is the ability to navigate the provincial patchwork of different local government procedures and legislation.

Conclusion

As you can see, no single characteristic defines the complexity of a jurisdiction. Factors vary, from whether a jurisdiction relies on civil or common law, to the influence of religion or political instability, to the number of provinces that have different compliance requirements, and more. Internal teams who manage their global corporate compliance and governance must stay alert to a combination of factors that are different for each jurisdiction. Combine these challenges with differences in time zone, language and culture, and it's easy to understand how demanding and nuanced global business compliance is, for all jurisdictions, not only these eight.

To learn more about how CT can help you better manage your global compliance needs, contact a CT representative at 844-318-1457 (toll-free US).

Business Type
Main Navigation Tags
Premium Content
Off
Product Tagging
Business Role
Accountant
Advisor
Analyst
CEO / COO / VP
CFO
Compliance Officer
Corporate Controller
Corporate Secretary
Entrepreneur
General Counsel
Investment Banker
Investor
Lawyer
Legal Administrator
Owner
Paralegal
Para-Professional
Venture Capitalist
Business Segment
Complex Operators
Resource Optimizer
Dealmaker
Business Size
Small Business
Middle Market
Corporation
International Corporation
Large Law firm
Small Law Firms
Customer Type
Customer
Prospect
Geography International
International
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (see Timor-Leste)
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea, South
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territories
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Industry Type
Agriculture
Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Aircraft
Airline
Apparel & Accessories
Automotive
Banking
Broadcasting
Brokerage
Biotechnology
Computer
Consulting
Consumer Products
Cosmetics
Defense
Department Stores
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment & Leisure
Executive Search
Financial Services
Grocery Health Care
Internet Publishing
Investment Banking
Legal
Manufacturing
Motion Picture & Video
Music
Newspaper Publishers
Online Auctions
Pension Funds
Pharmaceuticals
Private Equity
Publishing
Real Estate
Retail & Wholesale
Securities & Commodity Exchanges
Service
Software
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
Television
Transportation
Trucking
Venture Capital
Content Type